It sounds as though you're
not particularly interested in exploring the experience a poem wants to give
you. There's nothing wrong with that. Some people are not interested in what
poems do. Some people are not interested in baseball, some are not interested
in poems. If we go to a baseball game for the final score, there's no point in
arriving before the ninth inning. And if we go to a poem just for the meaning,
we can search to internet for a convenient paraphrase--which may or may not be
accurate, but which is not the poem anymore than the box score is a baseball
game. We have to learn to enjoy baseball or we can't enjoy it. The same again
is true of poetry. I'm always concerned about the fact that we encounter poetry
most often in school. School is where we learn about poems because we not yet
at the place where we can experience the poetry of poems in the way a baseball
fan experiences a game of baseball.
It's the poetry in baseball that
makes it fun. And it's a lack of sensitivity to that poetry that makes it
boring to the uninitiated. Learning what poems do is something that happens all
in the head, in the same part of the brain that does math. (There's also a
poetry to math, but you have to be pretty good at it before you can experience
it.) That part of your brain where you learn without experiencing is always
boring. With all these things: math, baseball, poems (also grammar, cars,
sewing, pottery, cooking, rearing children or raising chickens) there is the
poetry--where the fun part of your brain explodes with fireworks and
orgasms--and there's the "what the hell does that mean? How on earth does
that work?" “What in God’s name just happened?” part of it. The boring and
t frustrating. I hold out the hope that everyone loves poetry. But some people
never experience it. And some people never experience it in poems.
